Well, I'm trapped in Chicago for, at the very least, eight and a half more hours, so I've taken the opportunity to upload a few of my most recent photos. I'm technically in the middle of about 7 drawings right now. I keep losing interest once I get to the point of colouring backgrounds.

The only drawing I've actually
finished-finished recently is my offering for the DG Exchange, and I haven't submitted it yet because [text redacted in case it makes my exchange submission too easily recognizable].
--
~§å®ßø¥~
"You've got to stand for something
or you'll fall for anything."
Visit my dA portfolio and my profile, =StarBoyDeath, that's me.
Photomanipulation Essentials
Though I have to say I like 80, Why? better than this one. Funny, huh? ^_^
--
Say what?
--
Half of writing history is hiding the truth.
^_^
--
Say what?
Your gallery is definitely NICE!
Have a Happy Holiday Season!
--
I'm makin' a list...and checking it twice....gonna find out whose naughty or nice.
And oh no, why did the 7th book kill fandom for you?! Did you not like the 7th book?
I actually loved the 7th book until the prologue. I accept that it's JKR's world, but a 17 year time lapse was so hard for me to accept. I kept thinking of the characters as 17 years old, so all the babies and practically grown-up children really, really threw me off. Anyways, I would have been a lot more interested to hear about the restructuring of the wizarding world after Voldemort's defeat than anything about babies and marriage. Boring. ^_^ The prologue could have been so interesting, but JKR insisted on, for one thing, that all Slytherins are evil? There's not even the slightest redemption for any of them anywhere at any time? Not even 17 years in the future?? And the only Slytherin who worked for Good is dead? Man, boo on that. That's akin enough to hardcore prejudice that I just have to completely ignore it.
It was just so disappointing, when Rowling could have tackled redemption in an intelligent manner in a way that would have reached millions of people, and she insisted on sticking with a "your ambitious inclinations as an 11 year old means you're doomed to be EVIL" pov. Just really, really disappointing. I guess I expected too much.
/my thoughts on yaoi ^_^
--
Half of writing history is hiding the truth.
Guess what? I found you on SCUSA! You posted under the user name "Trixie" but signed your posts "Trixie the deified." And before you think that I'm some sort of stalker and spent hours on SCUSA looking for your posts... Let me point out that last month--in celebration of F&I's 100th thread--my friend Mousey and I went through all 100 threads and kept track of what shippers posted on which threads, and Mousey made one big spreadsheet of "Shippers who have posted over the years." (We did this for F&I's "Thank you, shippers!" page on Mousey's thread website: [link] Cool, huh?
Hey, I've got some of your sister's D/G fanart favorited! Her work is awesome!
I TOTALLY agree with you on the crapilogue (as I like to call it). It wasn't very well-written, it was boring, it was unnecessary, and it was way too fluffy, but not even a GOOD kind of fluffy. It was an annoying, boring kind of fluffy. xP And I so agree! Rowling has ALWAYS been soooo anti-Slytherin that it's not even funny! Remember now absolutely *none* of the Slytherins stayed to fight in the Battle of Hogwarts?! That just seemed...unrealistic, I guess. Couldn't there have been at least *one* Slytherin who stayed, or snuck away and came back to fight (like Draco, Crabbe, and Goyle, even though they weren't fighting for the Light side)? Ugh.
"/my thoughts on yaoi ^_^"
Wait, I'm not 100% sure I know what you mean. Yaoi is another word for slash, right? Are you saying that you think Rowling could have used her influence over all of her fans and introduced a mature slash relationship in the books? If so, I AGREE. <3 I think a little bit of Seamus/Dean would have been adorable, or maybe a brief mention of Sirius/Remus.
And if that's not what you meant, then whoops. xD
I can't remember exactly what AARGH ended up standing for, but it was/is a FAP group that was anti Harry/Ginny shipping.
Crapilogue is a good word for it. I think Rowling really undermined her whole "choice" theme by defining all Slytherins as irrevocably evil. I mean, not a single Slytherin decided to go good? Not one? Not even some anonymous 6th year? Whatevs. I don't really have any feelings one way or the other about slash's presence in canon, tbh. I probably should, I guess.
Hmm, I just realised I called the epilogue the prologue in my previous post. Obviously you knew what I meant. ^_^
--
Half of writing history is hiding the truth.
And I found A.R.G.H.'s first thread: [link] Is your sister Archchancellor?
Previous Page12345...Next Page